The client faced two life offenses pursuant to four felonies during an alleged sexual assault of a co-worker. At trial, cross-examination of the Nurse Examiner revealed inconsistencies in the accusing witness’ testimony. Defense evidence also produced phone records and police body camera which showed the client denying the accusations prior to his arrest. After a 6-hour deliberation, a jury acquitted the client of all charges.

The Client was a 30-year-old professional that met two women from a social media dating site. Following a night of drinking, the client was accused of multiple sex crimes that could have resulted in a life term of imprisonment. At trial, video evidence and cross-examination contradicted the claims of the alleged victims. The client was exonerated of all charges.

The client was accused of texting while driving prior to an accident that resulted in a fatality. Investigation revealed contributory negligence on behalf of the decedent. Additional expert questioning Revealed that most of the text messages in question did not occur during the driving behavior. The client was found not guilty.

The client was captured on video striking two teenage drivers following a traffic incident. The client faced 2 malicious wounding charges and 10 to 40 years imprisonment. Cross-examination of the alleged victims revealed inconsistencies in their stories concerning the events before the confrontation. At trial a jury dismiss one charge completely and convicted on my misdemeanor.

The client was the driver of a vehicle in an accident which involved severe injuries to one passenger and fatality for another. The client played guilty to reduced charges. The court was presented with a multi page mitigation document detailing the clients contributions to society and numerous support letters. The trial judge initially imposed a sentence at the low end of the sentencing guidelines. At a subsequent hearing on reconsideration the court reduced that sentence by 50% resulting in a sentence far below the sentencing guidelines.

The client was charged with third offense possession with intent to distribute methamphetamine. He faced mandatory minimum 10 years. At trial, I pointed to a procedural error involving the filing of the drug lab result. The court dismissed the case.

The client was charged with committing an assault with a baseball bat. When police spoke to the victim he was bleeding from both hands. During cross-examination, the alleged victim acknowledged that he suffered from a bleeding disorder and could not remember what caused the injuries to his hands. The court dismissed the charge and ruled that forensic evidence did not sufficiently corroborate the states version of assault.